Big vs. little science a follow up to the Canadian funding controversy

This is an interesting paper related to the controversy on funding strategy I blogged about last week. If we could predict the next big scientific break through we should focus funding on “excellence”, but if we can not predict it we should fund a wide range of projects. Well this paper adds some data to this discussion and concludes that there is only a weak effect of funding volume on scientific output. Something to think about!

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0065263

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s